- Asked by: Jamie Hepburn, MSP for Cumbernauld and Kilsyth, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Friday, 08 February 2013
-
Current Status:
Answered by Margaret Burgess on 5 March 2013
To ask the Scottish Government what estimate it has made of the number of children in Scotland who will be deemed to be in poverty as a result of changes in welfare benefits since 2010.
Answer
The Scottish Government does not produce forecasts of poverty, however analysis published by the Institute for Fiscal Studies in October 2011 estimated that the number of children in the UK living in relative poverty will rise by approximately 700,000 between 2009-10 and 2020-21. In 2009-10 200,000 children, 20 per cent of children, were living in relative income poverty in Scotland, this was 7.7 per cent of all children in the UK living in relative income poverty. Assuming Scotland’s share of UK child poverty remains unchanged at 7.7 per cent in future years, this would imply an additional 50,000 children in Scotland will be living in relative poverty by 2020-21. This estimate does not include changes subsequently introduced by the UK Government.
- Asked by: Jamie Hepburn, MSP for Cumbernauld and Kilsyth, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Monday, 25 February 2013
-
Current Status:
Taken in the Chamber on 28 February 2013
To ask the First Minister what the impact will be on the Scottish economy of the downgrading of the UK Government’s bond rating.
Answer
Taken in the Chamber on 28 February 2013
- Asked by: Jamie Hepburn, MSP for Cumbernauld and Kilsyth, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Wednesday, 13 February 2013
-
Current Status:
Taken in the Chamber on 21 February 2013
To ask the Scottish Government what importance is placed on Education Scotland’s findings on local authority plans to close schools.
Answer
Taken in the Chamber on 21 February 2013
- Asked by: Jamie Hepburn, MSP for Cumbernauld and Kilsyth, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Wednesday, 30 January 2013
-
Current Status:
Taken in the Chamber on 6 February 2013
To ask the Scottish Government what steps it is taking to encourage healthy eating in Cumbernauld and Kilsyth.
Answer
Taken in the Chamber on 6 February 2013
- Asked by: Jamie Hepburn, MSP for Cumbernauld and Kilsyth, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 17 January 2013
-
Current Status:
Answered by Nicola Sturgeon on 29 January 2013
To ask the Scottish Government what estimates it has made of the number of extra children in Scotland who will be deemed to be in poverty as a result of the provisions in the Welfare Benefits Up-rating Bill.
Answer
The Department of Work and Pensions are estimating that the uprating measures in 2013-14, 2014-15 and 2015-16 will result in around an extra 200,000 children being in relative income poverty compared to uprating benefits by CPI. Based on Scotland’s current share of children in poverty, this will result in an estimated 15,000 children being pushed into poverty as a result of the 1% uprating of working-age benefits.
- Asked by: Jamie Hepburn, MSP for Cumbernauld and Kilsyth, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Wednesday, 09 January 2013
-
Current Status:
Taken in the Chamber on 16 January 2013
To ask the Scottish Government how it plans to ensure that student debt in Scotland remains the lowest in the UK.
Answer
Taken in the Chamber on 16 January 2013
- Asked by: Jamie Hepburn, MSP for Cumbernauld and Kilsyth, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Wednesday, 28 November 2012
-
Current Status:
Answered by John Swinney on 5 December 2012
To ask the Scottish Government what it considers the economic impact will be of the proposed merger between AG Barr and Britvic.
Answer
Both A G Barr Plc and Britvic Plc provided details in a Joint Statement on 14 November 2012 on the terms of a recommended all share merger. That document suggests that the merger will create one of the leading soft drinks companies in Europe, which will be headquartered in Scotland.
The government will wish to work closely with any new merged company as it does currently with AG Barr.
- Asked by: Jamie Hepburn, MSP for Cumbernauld and Kilsyth, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Wednesday, 21 November 2012
-
Current Status:
Taken in the Chamber on 28 November 2012
To ask the Scottish Government what guidance it provides to local authorities to deliver safe transport routes to schools.
Answer
Taken in the Chamber on 28 November 2012
- Asked by: Jamie Hepburn, MSP for Cumbernauld and Kilsyth, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Monday, 29 October 2012
-
Current Status:
Answered by Nicola Sturgeon on 16 November 2012
To ask the Scottish Government, further to the answer to question S4F-00858 by Alex Salmond on 20 September 2012, (Official Report, c. 11704), how much it has spent in dealing with the freedom of information (FOI) requests by the anonymous submitter referred to by the First Minister and what the average cost of dealing with FOI requests has been since 2007.
Answer
The report of the Scottish Government’s FOI Costing Exercise 2012, which was published on 14 November, shows that the average cost to the Scottish Government of responding an FOI request is £231, the cost of an internal review is £417, and an appeal to the Scottish Information Commissioner costs £1,250. The previous cost exercise, carried out by this Government in 2010, is published on the Scottish Government website at: http://www.scotland.gov.uk/About/Information/FOI/FOICostReport.
Our records show that the anonymous requester referred to by the First Minister has submitted 13.5 per cent of all of the requests received by the Scottish Government between the start of the summer recess on 29 June and 6 November 2012. Based on the results of the costing exercise, the costs to the government are:
85 Requests £ 19,635
6 Requests for internal review £ 2,502
1 Appeal to the Commissioner £ 1,250
Total £ 23,387
- Asked by: Jamie Hepburn, MSP for Cumbernauld and Kilsyth, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Wednesday, 07 November 2012
-
Current Status:
Answered by Nicola Sturgeon on 15 November 2012
To ask the Scottish Government what benefits it expects to arise from the shift from the PFI/PPP to the non-profit distributing financing model.
Answer
The NPD model seeks to transfer risk and exert private sector discipline both during the construction phase of a project and throughout its lifetime, but without the excessive profits to the private sector and financing costs to the public sector associated with past PFI projects.
The key benefits of the NPD model are:
-
returns to the private sector are capped;
-
NPD does not contain dividend-bearing equity;
-
surpluses from NPD projects can be directed in favour of the public sector; and
-
enhanced stakeholder involvement in the management of projects.