- Asked by: Patrick Harvie, MSP for Glasgow, Scottish Green Party
-
Date lodged: Tuesday, 08 March 2011
-
Current Status:
Answered by Fergus Ewing on 21 March 2011
To ask the Scottish Executive on how many occasions authorisations for dispersal powers under section 19 of the Antisocial Behaviour etc. (Scotland) Act 2004 have been made where the grounds cited include antisocial behaviour by children or young people in each year since 2005, broken down by (a) police force and (b) local authority area.
Answer
I refer the member to the answer to question S3W-40598 on 21 March 2011. All answers to written parliamentary questions are available on the Parliament''s website, the search facility for which can be found at
http://www.scottish.parliament.uk/Apps2/Business/PQA/Default.aspx.
- Asked by: Patrick Harvie, MSP for Glasgow, Scottish Green Party
-
Date lodged: Tuesday, 08 March 2011
-
Current Status:
Answered by Fergus Ewing on 21 March 2011
To ask the Scottish Executive how many antisocial behaviour orders have been granted in relation to people (a) under 16, (b) 16-17 and (c) over 18 in each year since 2005, broken down by local authority area.
Answer
The use of antisocial behaviour measures covering the period October 2004 to March 2008, including dispersal orders, can be found on the Scottish Government website at
www.scotland.gov.uk. Information beyond that date is not held centrally.
- Asked by: Patrick Harvie, MSP for Glasgow, Scottish Green Party
-
Date lodged: Tuesday, 08 March 2011
-
Current Status:
Answered by Fergus Ewing on 21 March 2011
To ask the Scottish Executive on how many occasions authorisations for dispersal powers under section 19 of the Antisocial Behaviour etc. (Scotland) Act 2004 have been made in each year since 2005, broken down by (a) police force and (b) local authority area.
Answer
The use of antisocial behaviour measures covering the period October 2004 to March 2008, including dispersal orders, can be found on the Scottish Government website at
www.scotland.gov.uk. Information beyond that date is not held centrally.
- Asked by: Patrick Harvie, MSP for Glasgow, Scottish Green Party
-
Date lodged: Tuesday, 08 March 2011
-
Current Status:
Answered by Kenny MacAskill on 21 March 2011
To ask the Scottish Executive whether it monitors the use by local authorities and police forces of acceptable behaviour contracts in respect of children and young people, particularly in relation to the frequency and circumstances of their use.
Answer
The information requested is not held centrally.
- Asked by: Patrick Harvie, MSP for Glasgow, Scottish Green Party
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 03 March 2011
-
Current Status:
Answered by Keith Brown on 16 March 2011
To ask the Scottish Executive whether there are insurance policies or contingency liabilities in place for local residents and businesses for any damage incurred to them during construction of the Forth Replacement Crossing.
Answer
Insurance will be taken out to cover damage to third parties as a result of the construction of the Forth Replacement Crossing. There are no contingent liabilities in respect of those third parties.
- Asked by: Patrick Harvie, MSP for Glasgow, Scottish Green Party
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 03 March 2011
-
Current Status:
Answered by Keith Brown on 16 March 2011
To ask the Scottish Executive what contingency liability there is for third parties affected by possible damage to the BP Forties pipeline system during construction of the Forth Replacement Crossing, for example as a result of evacuation and clean-up costs.
Answer
A contingent liability exists in connection with the proposed construction of the Forth Crossing where it impacts on the existing BP Fortes oil pipeline. The contingent liability is required to cover the remote possibility that the pipeline could be damaged as a result of the construction of the new bridge. This is a potential liability to the contract not a cost, and as such does not increase the estimated cost of the project.
- Asked by: Patrick Harvie, MSP for Glasgow, Scottish Green Party
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 03 March 2011
-
Current Status:
Answered by Keith Brown on 16 March 2011
To ask the Scottish Executive whether provision has been made for any damage to the BP Forties pipeline system after the Forth Replacement Crossing is completed and, if so, how this has been calculated and costed.
Answer
The issue has been discussed in confidence by the finance committee.
- Asked by: Patrick Harvie, MSP for Glasgow, Scottish Green Party
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 03 March 2011
-
Current Status:
Answered by Keith Brown on 14 March 2011
To ask the Scottish Executive whether there are insurance policies or contingency liabilities in place for local residents and businesses for any damage incurred to them in the event of the BP Forties pipeline system being damaged during construction of the Forth Replacement Crossing.
Answer
The Project Insurance Programme includes provision for third party damage. There are no Third Party Contingent Liabilities.
- Asked by: Patrick Harvie, MSP for Glasgow, Scottish Green Party
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 03 March 2011
-
Current Status:
Answered by Keith Brown on 14 March 2011
To ask the Scottish Executive what the actual cost to BP will be if the Forties pipeline system is damaged during construction of the Forth Replacement Crossing.
Answer
Financial information relating to those costs is commercially confidential and cannot be released. In any event, the actual costs cannot be determined in the abstract and will depend on the particular facts and circumstances.
- Asked by: Patrick Harvie, MSP for Glasgow, Scottish Green Party
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 03 March 2011
-
Current Status:
Answered by Keith Brown on 14 March 2011
To ask the Scottish Executive what volume of oil would be spilt if the BP Forties pipeline system were ruptured during construction of the Forth Replacement Crossing.
Answer
While the volume has been calculated for designing suitable mitigation measures it would be inappropriate to release this information.
