- Asked by: Fergus Ewing, MSP for Inverness East, Nairn and Lochaber, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Tuesday, 15 October 2002
-
Current Status:
Answered by David Steel on 12 December 2002
To ask the Presiding Officer whether the Scottish Parliamentary Corporate Body will list, for each works package under the Holyrood project where a performance bond was obtained, (a) the name of the company awarded the contract, (b) details of the work involved and (c) the dates on which (i) the tenders were to have been received, (ii) the construction manager made the recommendation that the contract be awarded, (iii) any first or sole letter of intent was issued and (iv) the trade contract was concluded.
Answer
My letter of 5 December 2002, to the Convener of the Finance Committee, reported that a list of individual contractors or contracts, where performance bonds have, or have not, been requested, cannot be provided for reasons of commercial confidentiality. I am, therefore, unable to provide the information requested.
- Asked by: Fergus Ewing, MSP for Inverness East, Nairn and Lochaber, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 28 November 2002
-
Current Status:
Answered by Jim Wallace on 11 December 2002
To ask the Scottish Executive, further to the answer to question S1W-31074 by Ross Finnie on 20 November 2002, why it will not state which of its representatives spoke at the Agriculture and Fisheries Council meeting on 14-15 October 2002; why it regards such information as confidential, and whether it will now provide the information sought in that question.
Answer
The Scottish Executive's participation in the EU policy-making process is subject to the Concordat on the co-ordination of EU policy issues, which includes explicit provisions on the confidentiality of discussions.
- Asked by: Fergus Ewing, MSP for Inverness East, Nairn and Lochaber, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 28 November 2002
-
Current Status:
Answered by Frank McAveety on 11 December 2002
To ask the Scottish Executive, further to the answer to question S1F-2269 by Mr Jack McConnell on 21 November 2002, what financial assumptions were used to compute the total provision for implementation of free personal care for the elderly in the Highland Council area; which assumptions formed the basis of its conclusion that the "total provision for implementing the policy is sufficient to enable all local authorities to meet their commitments to existing self funding residents"; what estimate it made of the additional demand stimulated by this policy, and whether it will review its allocation in the light of evidence on the demand and take-up rate of free personal care in the council area.
Answer
Highland Council's free personal and nursing care total allocation in 2002-03 was £4.106 million. Of this, £2.092 million was based on the most recent information available on the number of residents funding their own care in residential and nursing homes in that area. In addition, the council received £2.014 million which was distributed pro rata through the Grant Aided Expenditure formula for social work services for home-based older people. The Spending Review 2002 settlement reflects the Care Development Group's (CDG) costing assumptions for free personal care. The group took into account, as key influences, demography along with other relevant health and social factors, change in the unit costs of care, supply of informal care and possible shifts in care provision. Their assumptions estimated an increase in demand from unmet need and a shift from informal to formal care of approximately 12% building up over the first two years of the policy to 2004-05. The Executive provided resources in excess of those identified by the CDG.The Executive will be collecting data from local authorities on the uptake of free personal and nursing care on a quarterly basis. This will inform whether any adjustment of allocation is necessary.
- Asked by: Fergus Ewing, MSP for Inverness East, Nairn and Lochaber, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 28 November 2002
-
Current Status:
Answered by Lewis Macdonald on 11 December 2002
To ask the Scottish Executive what road safety measures it will implement for the communities of Duror and Kentallen on the A828.
Answer
In addition to the recently completed £233,700 footway in Duror, the final section of footway at the War Memorial is currently being discussed with Highland Council and once agreement is reached this section will be programmed for implementation.The double white line system through Duror is due to be refurbished within the next few weeks and improvements to the visibility at Achindarroch junction are being investigated.Speed surveys are being undertaken at two locations within Duror and will be used to re-assess the need for a speed limit.Officials have contacted the Duror and Kentallen Community Council and a meeting will be arranged with them shortly to discuss these and other issues.
- Asked by: Fergus Ewing, MSP for Inverness East, Nairn and Lochaber, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 28 November 2002
-
Current Status:
Answered by Lewis Macdonald on 11 December 2002
To ask the Scottish Executive how many people in rural areas it estimates have no access to public transport and what assistance it provides to such people under any of its current programmes.
Answer
The Scottish Household Survey (SHS) collects data from a sample of Scottish households on an annual basis. In the three years from 1999 to 2001, on average 7% of people living in rural areas said that they did not have a bus service.The Executive supports transport in rural areas through the Rural Transport Fund (RTF). This supports over 400 new or enhanced bus and ferry services and over 100 Rural Community Transport Initiative projects.
- Asked by: Fergus Ewing, MSP for Inverness East, Nairn and Lochaber, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 28 November 2002
-
Current Status:
Answered by Malcolm Chisholm on 11 December 2002
To ask the Scottish Executive what the total cost of medical negligence claims against the NHS has been in each of the last 10 years, broken down by the (a) amount of any compensation paid to the claimant and (b) total costs of handling any such claims, and whether it has assessed such costs against those of a "no fault" health insurance scheme.
Answer
The following table provides details of the cost of medical negligence claims over the last 10 years.
Financial Year | Total Award | Total Expenses | Total Cost |
1992-93 | £1,794,429 | £277,558 | £2,071,987 |
1993-94 | £1,892,312 | £252,290 | £2,144,602 |
1994-95 | £3,051,962 | £342,016 | £3,393,978 |
1995-96 | £3,554,930 | £569,043 | £4,123,973 |
1996-97 | £4,059,883 | £535,621 | £4,595,504 |
1997-98 | £3,521,199 | £623,936 | £4,145,135 |
1998-99 | £3,303,709 | £653,383 | £3,957,092 |
1999-2000 | £2,955,357 | £555,778 | £3,511,135 |
2000-01 | £3,925,462 | £890,870 | £4,816,332 |
2001-02 | £6,462,315 | £815,534 | £7,277,849 |
There has been no comparison undertaken between compensation paid in these cases and what the levels of compensation may have been paid under a "no fault" health insurance scheme.There are currently no plans to alter the way in which compensation is claimed and settled for acts of possible clinical negligence. However, you will be aware that in response to the reports published earlier in the year, by the Royal Society of Edinburgh and the Church of Scotland, the Scottish Executive established an expert group to look at current compensation arrangements for patients injured by the NHSScotland. This group is due to report by the end of 2002.
- Asked by: Fergus Ewing, MSP for Inverness East, Nairn and Lochaber, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 28 November 2002
-
Current Status:
Answered by Lewis Macdonald on 11 December 2002
To ask the Scottish Executive how many sailings have been missed between the mainland and the northern isles since Northlink Orkney and Shetland Ferries Ltd took over the routes from P & O Scottish Ferries.
Answer
I understand that Northlink Orkney and Shetland Ferries Ltd intends to publish detailed information on missed sailings and late arrivals on its website at
www.northlinkferries.co.uk, and I refer the member to that site for regular performance information. I expect to receive a monthly report from the company, in terms of our agreement with them, within six weeks of the end of the month concerned.
- Asked by: Fergus Ewing, MSP for Inverness East, Nairn and Lochaber, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 28 November 2002
-
Current Status:
Answered by Jim Wallace on 11 December 2002
To ask the Scottish Executive whether it will consider reforming the law so that public authorities are placed under a statutory obligation to inform the police when they have good grounds to believe that a crime has been committed, or is about to committed, by an employee or employees or anyone on their premises.
Answer
We have no current plans to do so. At present, employers generally have the option but not the legal obligation to ask the police to investigate suspected crimes on their premises. There are some limited statutory exceptions to this. For example, where employers suspect that money laundering may be taking place, then steps must be taken to bring this to the attention of supervising authorities.Regardless of the attitude of public agencies, there is nothing to prevent an employee or any other person making a complaint about a suspected criminal offence to a professional body, the police or the procurator fiscal. The Public Interest Disclosure Act 1998 provides protection for individuals who make certain disclosures of information in the public interest. This includes the disclosure of information which, in the reasonable belief of the worker making the disclosure, tends to show inter alia that a criminal offence has been committed, is being committed or is likely to be committed.Nevertheless I will consider the specific examples raised in correspondence from the member and respond to him.
- Asked by: Fergus Ewing, MSP for Inverness East, Nairn and Lochaber, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 28 November 2002
-
Current Status:
Answered by Ross Finnie on 11 December 2002
To ask the Scottish Executive what plans it has to simplify the regulatory system applied to the agriculture industry.
Answer
The Scottish Executive will continue to press the European Commission to allow further simplification of the subsidy schemes on such things as form filling, proportionality of penalties, inspection procedures and detailed scheme rules.
- Asked by: Fergus Ewing, MSP for Inverness East, Nairn and Lochaber, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Wednesday, 27 November 2002
-
Current Status:
Answered by Allan Wilson on 11 December 2002
To ask the Scottish Executive whether there are any difficulties in bringing into operation the new Scottish Forestry Grants Scheme and, in particular, in relation to the software to be used in connection with the scheme and its administration; whether there is any delay in when the scheme will come into operation; what the planned start date is; when the scheme will be fully operational, and whether European Union approval was required in respect of the scheme and, if so, whether this has been obtained.
Answer
The Scottish Forestry Grants Scheme (SFGS) represents a major change from the current Woodland Grant Scheme and Farm Woodland Premium Scheme (both of which operate across Great Britain). Development of information systems to support SFGS is a significant task and, to ensure that the systems are properly developed and tested, the Forestry Commission has recently announced that applications for SFGS will not be accepted until June 2003, after which the scheme should be fully operational. This represents a two-month delay to the original target date of April 2003, but the existing grant schemes are being kept open for an additional two months to minimise any inconvenience to the industry. The necessary changes to the Scottish Rural Development Plan have been approved by the EU STAR (Agricultural Structures and Rural Development Committee), as announced on 19 November.