- Asked by: Rhoda Grant, MSP for Highlands and Islands, Scottish Labour
-
Date lodged: Friday, 09 May 2025
-
Current Status:
Answered by Jenni Minto on 21 May 2025
To ask the Scottish Government how many people were interviewed as part of the Pain Management Panel report, which was published in November 2022, broken down by NHS board area; what its position is on whether publishing the views of 16 people in the report presents a fair representation of the 800,000 people in Scotland who experience chronic pain; for what reason (a) the reported screening questionnaire used to produce the report did not directly ask participants about whether their condition had been diagnosed by a health professional and (b) respondents were reportedly paid £200 each to participate in the survey; whether known pain patient volunteers were asked to take part in the survey, and whether it sought guidance from NICE or any other body on the suitability of a "no impact" categorisation being used in the survey.
Answer
The Pain Management Panel consisted of 16 people with lived experience of chronic pain. A sampling framework was developed by The Lines Between to ensure diversity within the panel across participants’ experiences, circumstances, and characteristics. The sampling framework was designed to recruit 15 participants to the pain management panel with the intention to interview a group of 22-25 people to mitigate potential attrition during the project.
The Scottish Government does not hold information on how many people were interviewed.
The Scottish Government does not hold information on which NHS board area the volunteers lived in. More information on the demographics of the panel can be found in the report.
The Scottish Government does not hold any special category data, such as details of a medical diagnosis, for the participants of the pain management panel.
The Pain Management Panel is just one of the ways we engage with people with lived experience. The report was primarily intended to provide detailed qualitative information and illustrative examples of participants’ experience living with chronic pain, rather than being an exact representation of the prevalence of chronic pain in Scotland’s wider population.
Participants in the panel were reimbursed for their time in line with the Scottish Government’s guidelines.
This term ‘no impact’ was proposed by the Scottish Government as a contraction of ‘did not experience any limitation on life or work activities over the past three months’. This was designed to align with the questions in the Scottish Health Survey which showed that 22% of the more than 4000 adults surveyed did not experience any impact on their work or life activities.
- Asked by: Rhoda Grant, MSP for Highlands and Islands, Scottish Labour
-
Date lodged: Friday, 16 May 2025
-
Current Status:
Answer expected on 30 May 2025
To ask the Scottish Government, regarding the reported £4.4 million ferries "resilience fund", which routes will be covered and what the (a) eligibility criteria, (b) application process and (c) rates of compensation payable will be.
Answer
Answer expected on 30 May 2025
- Asked by: Rhoda Grant, MSP for Highlands and Islands, Scottish Labour
-
Date lodged: Friday, 16 May 2025
-
Current Status:
Answer expected on 30 May 2025
To ask the Scottish Government, regarding the reported £4.4 million ferries "resilience fund", whether applications will be backdated, and, if not, from what date applications will be eligible.
Answer
Answer expected on 30 May 2025
- Asked by: Rhoda Grant, MSP for Highlands and Islands, Scottish Labour
-
Date lodged: Friday, 16 May 2025
-
Current Status:
Answer expected on 30 May 2025
To ask the Scottish Government whether it will provide a list of end dates for any leases it has issued to operate (a) windfarms, (b) other forms of renewable energy production and (c) energy storage on Forestry and Land Scotland land.
Answer
Answer expected on 30 May 2025
- Asked by: Rhoda Grant, MSP for Highlands and Islands, Scottish Labour
-
Date lodged: Friday, 16 May 2025
-
Current Status:
Answer expected on 30 May 2025
To ask the Scottish Government what percentage of the reported £801 million allocated to Scotland from European Structural and Investment Funds was claimed by 30 April 2025.
Answer
Answer expected on 30 May 2025
- Asked by: Rhoda Grant, MSP for Highlands and Islands, Scottish Labour
-
Date lodged: Friday, 16 May 2025
-
Current Status:
Answer expected on 30 May 2025
To ask the Scottish Government, regarding the reported £4.4 million ferries "resilience fund", how information on the (a) fund, (b) eligibility criteria and (c) application process will be conveyed to eligible communities.
Answer
Answer expected on 30 May 2025
- Asked by: Rhoda Grant, MSP for Highlands and Islands, Scottish Labour
-
Date lodged: Wednesday, 14 May 2025
-
Current Status:
Taken in the Chamber on 21 May 2025
To ask the Scottish Government whether it plans to allocate additional funding to Argyll and Bute Council, in light of reports of Argyll and Bute Health and Social Care Partnership’s funding deficit.
Answer
Taken in the Chamber on 21 May 2025
- Asked by: Rhoda Grant, MSP for Highlands and Islands, Scottish Labour
-
Date lodged: Wednesday, 09 April 2025
-
Current Status:
Answered by Gillian Martin on 2 May 2025
To ask the Scottish Government how many wind farms are on land owned by it, broken down by megawatts of wind capacity generated, and what proportion of these farms are community owned.
Answer
There are twenty-five operational windfarms on Scotland’s national forests and land, managed by Forestry and Land Scotland. None of the windfarms are community owned in whole or part.
Windfarm | Number of MW on Scotland’s National Forests and Land (*several projects are located largely on neighbouring private land) |
Deucheran Hill | 16 |
Cruach Mhor | 26 |
Beinn An Tuirc 1 | 9* |
Black Law | 20 |
Rothes 2 (Cairn Uish Hill) | 7* |
Whitelee 1 | 163 |
An Suidhe | 19 |
Camster | 22 |
Arecleoch | 106 |
Myres Hill | 2* |
Mid Hill | 53 |
Stroupster | 16 |
Little Clyde | 25 |
Burn of Whilk | 23 |
Beinn An Tuirc 2 | 44 |
Whitelee 2 | 193 |
Harestanes | 136 |
Clashindarroch | 37 |
A' Chruach | 43 |
Kilgallioch | 73 |
Blackcraig | 5* |
Beinn An Tuirc 3 | 50 |
West Benhar | 30 |
Halsary | 28 |
South Kyle | 240 |
- Asked by: Rhoda Grant, MSP for Highlands and Islands, Scottish Labour
-
Date lodged: Friday, 04 April 2025
-
Current Status:
Answered by Gillian Martin on 1 May 2025
To ask the Scottish Government what discussions it has had with NatureScot regarding maintaining and growing native oyster populations in Marine Protected Areas, and what actions are being considered.
Answer
MPAs are managed in line with the conservation and management advice provided by NatureScot. Management measures are already in place to achieve the conservation objectives for native oysters where they are a protected feature, by reducing the pressures that affect them. Additional protection is being considered for native oysters through the proposed PMF management areas as part of development of the inshore fisheries management measures.
The Scottish Government, with support from NatureScot, is currently developing a Marine and Coastal Restoration Plan which will support the Scottish Biodiversity Strategy objective of accelerating restoration and regeneration.
- Asked by: Rhoda Grant, MSP for Highlands and Islands, Scottish Labour
-
Date lodged: Friday, 04 April 2025
-
Current Status:
Answered by Gillian Martin on 29 April 2025
To ask the Scottish Government what its response is, in light of reports that native oyster numbers within the Loch Sween Marine Protected Area have significantly declined.
Answer
The Scottish Government is committed to managing our seas sustainably to protect their rich biological diversity. NatureScot are currently liaising with local stakeholders to better understand the situation within the Loch Sween MPA. Surveys will be carried out in the MPA this year to better assess the status of the native oysters across the loch.