Skip to main content
Loading…

Seòmar agus comataidhean

Official Report: search what was said in Parliament

The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.  

Criathragan Hide all filters

Dates of parliamentary sessions
  1. Session 1: 12 May 1999 to 31 March 2003
  2. Session 2: 7 May 2003 to 2 April 2007
  3. Session 3: 9 May 2007 to 22 March 2011
  4. Session 4: 11 May 2011 to 23 March 2016
  5. Session 5: 12 May 2016 to 4 May 2021
  6. Current session: 13 May 2021 to 8 April 2026
  7. Session 6: 13 May 2021 to 8 April 2026
Select which types of business to include


Select level of detail in results

Displaying 1989 contributions

|

Rural Affairs and Islands Committee

Salmon Farming in Scotland

Meeting date: 2 October 2024

Rachael Hamilton

However, earlier, you talked about the risk of lowering the sea lice burden—I wrote that down because it caught my attention. You spoke about it as a risk.

Rural Affairs and Islands Committee

Salmon Farming in Scotland

Meeting date: 2 October 2024

Rachael Hamilton

What did you mean by that?

Rural Affairs and Islands Committee

Salmon Farming in Scotland

Meeting date: 2 October 2024

Rachael Hamilton

I want to address Tavish Scott’s point. WildFish has also criticised the lack of data to make decisions, which has been exacerbated by the gap of 20 per cent in data counts since 2021.

Rural Affairs and Islands Committee

Pre-budget Scrutiny 2025-26

Meeting date: 25 September 2024

Rachael Hamilton

What was your reaction to the comments of various academics and former Scottish Government employees about the downfall of the international reputation of the Scottish scientific output on fisheries?

Rural Affairs and Islands Committee

Subordinate Legislation

Meeting date: 25 September 2024

Rachael Hamilton

The same consideration will apply not just to abattoirs but to game processing plants, milk producers, fisheries, aquaculture products and so on. I note that Salmon Scotland responded to the consultation. My point about this SSI is that it is disappointing that, although most of the responses came from GB-wide stakeholders, there was only one Scottish response. Salmon Scotland’s response speaks to some of the concerns that the committee has raised in the past about the engagement process and ensuring that people are not taken unawares by the potential for increased costs.

As my colleague Rhoda Grant, in particular, has pointed out, we are in a difficult trading environment, with costs rising as a result of inflationary pressures. What efforts are being made to ensure that, in this scenario, there are no cliff edges?

Rural Affairs and Islands Committee

Subordinate Legislation

Meeting date: 25 September 2024

Rachael Hamilton

Just to be clear, most people wanted the sector-based and tailored option. You have talked about headage of cattle, but how is that equated? Is it according to, say, litres of milk? With a game processing plant, is it a brace of pheasants? How does it work?

Rural Affairs and Islands Committee

Subordinate Legislation

Meeting date: 25 September 2024

Rachael Hamilton

James Muldoon, could you or the minister run through what you said about how the future of LFASS or any replacement scheme will be shaped by stakeholders?

Rural Affairs and Islands Committee

Subordinate Legislation

Meeting date: 25 September 2024

Rachael Hamilton

Will the feedback from the ARIOB meeting shape the rural support plan?

Rural Affairs and Islands Committee

Subordinate Legislation

Meeting date: 25 September 2024

Rachael Hamilton

Good morning, Mr Fairlie. Did the Scottish Government consult on the regulations? If not, why not?

Rural Affairs and Islands Committee

Subordinate Legislation

Meeting date: 25 September 2024

Rachael Hamilton

Yes, but the committee does not have access to what has been said and fed back in the ARIOB, so we have no idea about what the feedback is in that co-development, which leaves our scrutiny of the SSI to a wing and a prayer, really.

I cannot see how the co-design argument can be used in this case, because it seems as though the Scottish Government is relying on the previous consultation. My question is to Jim Fairlie. Have you read the previous consultation responses?