The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1342 contributions
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 February 2026
The Deputy Convener
I have a further question, but I will bring in Sharon Dowey now to ensure that all colleagues get appropriate time.
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 February 2026
The Deputy Convener
As no other members have any questions, I want to clarify something, minister. In response to my second question at the start of the meeting, you told me—I am paraphrasing what I think that I heard—that raising the fine from £40 to £70 is not about providing a deterrent. However, the Scottish Government’s policy note on the SSI states in bullet point 3 that
“without revalorisation it no longer provides the proportionate deterrent originally envisaged by Parliament.”
That suggests that the raise is about providing a deterrent. Will you clarify that?
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 December 2025
Liam Kerr
To be clear, on the definition of a domestic abuse offender, your evidence is similar to the evidence that you gave to the committee previously, which is that it needs to align more closely with what is already in the statute book.
: To be clear, on the definition of a domestic abuse offender, your evidence is similar to the evidence that you gave to the committee previously, which is that it needs to align more closely with what is already in the statute book.
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 December 2025
Liam Kerr
Glyn Lloyd appeared to be signalling his agreement with some of Professor Gilchrist’s remarks, so I will come to him. Social Work Scotland’s submission highlights that a positive amendment that the committee might consider would be to include a notification requirement on a change of partner relationship. The submission also highlights that many families remain together following a conviction, so additional requirements might lead to retaliatory action. If that is right, is there not a risk that the Parliament might not legislate for fear of what an abuser might do—almost, that it would not do what is right for fear of how an abuser might react? Surely that is the wrong end of the telescope. How might the bill be adjusted to address that possibility, so that it achieves its aims without posing a risk to families?
: Glyn Lloyd appeared to be signalling his agreement with some of Professor Gilchrist’s remarks, so I will come to him. Social Work Scotland’s submission highlights that a positive amendment that the committee might consider would be to include a notification requirement on a change of partner relationship. The submission also highlights that many families remain together following a conviction, so additional requirements might lead to retaliatory action. If that is right, is there not a risk that the Parliament might not legislate for fear of what an abuser might do—almost, that it would not do what is right for fear of how an abuser might react? Surely that is the wrong end of the telescope. How might the bill be adjusted to address that possibility, so that it achieves its aims without posing a risk to families?
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 December 2025
Liam Kerr (North East Scotland) (Con)
Good morning. I will address my first question to the Law Society and COPFS. For good order, I remind colleagues that I am a practising lawyer and am regulated by the Law Society of Scotland.
: Good morning. I will address my first question to the Law Society and COPFS. For good order, I remind colleagues that I am a practising lawyer and am regulated by the Law Society of Scotland.
If the bill gets to stage 2, it is important that we tighten all the definitions and make the bill as good as it can be so that it achieves its aims. In its evidence, COPFS commented on the definition of a domestic abuse offender, and the Law Society made a similar point about the definition of offences involving domestic abuse. Dr Forbes, what is your concern about that definition? More importantly, perhaps, how might the committee look to tighten that definition through amendments to make the bill do what is intended?
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 December 2025
Liam Kerr
I understand.
: I understand.
I will put the same question to Professor Gilchrist. You talked about the definition of an offence involving domestic abuse. What are your thoughts on that?
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 December 2025
Liam Kerr
I understand.
: I understand.
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 December 2025
Liam Kerr
To be clear, on the definition of a domestic abuse offender, your evidence is similar to the evidence that you gave to the committee previously, which is that it needs to align more closely with what is already in the statute book.
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 December 2025
Liam Kerr
I understand.
I will put the same question to Professor Gilchrist. You talked about the definition of an offence involving domestic abuse. What are your thoughts on that?
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 December 2025
Liam Kerr
I understand.