The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1413 contributions
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 November 2025
Ivan McKee
The overall picture is that the cost of increased national insurance contributions to the Scottish public sector is about £700 million, and the amount of money received from the UK Government is about half of that. Money has been transferred to portfolios to cover those costs, including everything that the UK Government added in to support that—which was barely half of it—and additional funds that the Scottish Government has had to find to help with support for those costs.
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 November 2025
Ivan McKee
Yes, there was an increase of £246.8 million. That includes the annually managed expenditure provision for future national health service and teacher pension costs, which is obviously not available for day-to-day spending. At £141.9 million, AME is the biggest part of that figure. Under Transport Scotland, there is an extra £78.7 million for Scottish Rail Holdings, a non-departmental public body, for the lease costs of existing rolling stock—again, that has no impact on Scottish Government discretionary spending. There is a transfer of £24.1 million within the student loans budget line, which reflects updated estimates for student loan capital and capitalised interest requirements. That is another technical issue that does not have any impact on Scottish Government day-to-day spending.
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 November 2025
Ivan McKee
I will defer to officials on the technical aspects of that. Pensions are usually a complicated subject. They are affected by a range of factors.
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 November 2025
Ivan McKee
Indeed. Thank you for mentioning that.
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 November 2025
Ivan McKee
We are very clear on this. The way in which we traditionally do budgeting—we have been doing this stuff for a long time in the public sector—does not necessarily lend itself to an environment in which there is money moving between silos and to prevention and so on. I recognise that and I am happy to work with the committee on how we address it. Indeed, workstreams 5 and 6 are all about preventative budgeting and how we configure budgets.
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 November 2025
Ivan McKee
It will come in in March. A small part of it will fall into this year’s budget.
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 November 2025
Ivan McKee
It is the on-going costs of the SQA. You are right—
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 November 2025
Ivan McKee
If you look back at historical SQA budgets, you will see the reality of what its spend has been. That needs to be reflected in the budget going forward.
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 November 2025
Ivan McKee
The genesis of the Building Safety Levy (Scotland) Bill follows on from Grenfell and the requirement to find the funds to support retrofitting at-risk buildings. The intention of the building safety levy is, from memory, to raise about £30 million a year for Scottish Government funds over a 15-year period. The total fund required to retrofit is significantly in excess of that, so the levy covers only a small part of it. The rest will come out of general Government spending, which impacts other services. The levy is a mirror of the policy that has been taken forward in the rest of the UK by the UK Labour Government.
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 November 2025
Ivan McKee
I think that there is an appetite, which is evidenced by the fact that almost £300 million was spent to support that investment. It will be dependent on everybody’s circumstances, which will be different, but the ability to save on energy bills makes a significant difference. The cost of energy is very relevant; individuals will find themselves in a place where that investment could make a huge difference over time to their energy bills and to the quality of their housing and their lives—not to mention the net zero impact. It is an important investment and clearly there is still an appetite for it.