The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 923 contributions
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 September 2025
George Adam
It was in the submission. I was just following the evidence. [Laughter.]
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 September 2025
George Adam
My father-in-law is never away from the central library, as it is within walking distance for him.
Turning to the Scottish Artists Union, you were talking about a basic income pilot, Tamara. Could you give me some more detail on that? How would you perceive that working? I am always interested in new ways to look at things.
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 September 2025
George Adam
Yes, using data to back up what you are saying. You said earlier that the NHS saves £3.2 million through library-delivered health and wellbeing programmes—that is measurable. You are the first person to come here and actually say, “We deliver savings of £3.2 million.” No one else has ever done that. I am interested in things like that, because the Government will look at that and say, “There is a delivery outcome here.”
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 September 2025
George Adam
My next question is on the visitor levy. Everyone has mentioned getting access to it—we have already spent any potential money from that about three times over today. If, hypothetically, a proportion of visitor levy could be used, how would your organisations invest it, what would you do with it, and what outcomes would fit with what the Scottish Government is looking for?
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 September 2025
George Adam
I am 100 per cent behind you on that—the organisations create the footfall, so they should get that funding. However, would that not be skewed in some places? How would you do that in areas such as my own constituency of Paisley, or in other places across Scotland? Funding would almost be guaranteed in Edinburgh—boom; all the festivals would get a whole stack of funding. A positive argument could be made for that, but how would it work nationally?
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 September 2025
George Adam
Does anyone else want to come in?
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 September 2025
George Adam
Okay. You and previous witnesses have all said that cross-portfolio working would be a good idea. I totally buy into that, but the fact is that the Government is data driven. I asked a question about this area last week. If we were to be in a situation in which you believe that your organisations or what you do delivers in those key areas, what would be the quickest and most measurable outcomes that you could deliver—if we said that, from tomorrow, there was a possibility of getting people to work across portfolio?
Does anyone want to answer? Did that make any sense at all?
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 17 September 2025
George Adam
I am a former councillor, and we got the corporate parenting aspect right from day 1. I would find it strange if organisations that have corporate parenting responsibilities were not getting the message. I do not know what your feeling is across the board.
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 17 September 2025
George Adam
Do you not think that it is sometimes down to the individuals who are involved in the corporate parenting organisation?
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 17 September 2025
George Adam
Good morning, everyone. I want to ask about the corporate parenting aspect of the bill, because that has come up quite a bit in the evidence that we have received. Corporate parenting is one of those things that I had never heard of until I became a councillor, and then, all of a sudden, I became evangelical about it and how we go forward with it.
Some of the organisations that have given us evidence, especially Social Work Scotland, have argued that extending the corporate parenting duties to those who have experienced a small part of their life in care would create some human rights issues. Do you agree with that argument?
I understand why the provision is there; it is because anything could have happened in those young people’s lives, and they will probably still need support and care. However, it is quite concerning that Social Work Scotland is saying that.
Who would like to answer the question first?