The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 454 contributions
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 18 June 2025
Tim Eagle
My amendments 183 and 487 seek to remove the provisions in the bill that will introduce a model lease. Amendment 487 seeks to delete section 7, on model leases.
Realistically, I do not think that I will press the amendments to a vote, but I have lodged them for a reason, which is that stakeholders such as NFU Scotland believe that the current tenancy structure is sufficient. In addition, the NFUS has expressed a wider concern that the provisions in section 7 could result in the removal of land from agricultural production. I strongly support maintaining land, particularly good-quality land, for agricultural production.
The bill as introduced requires ministers
“to make publicly available a model lease designed for letting land so that it can be used ... for an environmental purpose”
via section 7. Section 7(4) sets out what is meant by “environmental purpose”. However, I feel that there is already scope in legislation for land to be used for a variety of reasons, and I therefore do not believe that the model lease is needed.
I am interested in the policy intent behind amendment 380, in the name of Ariane Burgess, on a model lease for hutting, and in the cabinet secretary’s response to that, as I have some concerns that it could be overly burdensome.
I move amendment 183.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 18 June 2025
Tim Eagle
I want to raise an issue with you, Elspeth Macdonald—it is one that has been slightly covered. In an ideal world—which we do not live in, but if we had one—when we balance the need for a trading relationship around the world and particularly with Europe, what would that arrangement look like? You mentioned annual negotiations, but what might the quota have looked like?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 18 June 2025
Tim Eagle
I am sorry, convener, but I will be slightly awkward. I have no issues with the seed fees instrument but, out of interest, do we happen to know the equivalent costs in other countries? There were no consultation responses, so I am just curious.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 18 June 2025
Tim Eagle
I just wondered whether the increase is fair. It is an increase of 6-point-something per cent, and I am always cautious of cost.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 18 June 2025
Tim Eagle
I want to follow up on Elena Whitham’s question, and my question is probably more for Jimmy Buchan than anyone else, although I would be interested in whether there is an agricultural product point of view on this, too. To what extent will processors in Scotland benefit from the deal? I note that there has been a 68 per cent reduction in landings into Scotland by foreign vessels. Will there be more products coming to UK processors and then shipped on to Europe because of the deal?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 18 June 2025
Tim Eagle
Thank you.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 18 June 2025
Tim Eagle
I want to come in on that very point. Presumably, most of us agree that the SPS agreement in itself is fine, but dynamic alignment is a risk. I guess that my question is this: what does that mean? What could the risks be of looking through the looking glass? What are the risks for businesses, farmers or your own members?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 June 2025
Tim Eagle
I have nothing further to add, convener. I press amendment 450.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 June 2025
Tim Eagle
I have a couple of comments. Overall, I think that some stakeholders are still significantly concerned that the lotting provisions are pretty unworkable. NFU Scotland published an interesting blog on that at the end of last week, I think, and Scottish Land & Estates has also commented on the issues. I have been reminded by someone that it is imperative that the European convention on human rights principles of public interest, rational connection to a policy intent, proportionality and balance should be satisfied when we look at lotting, and I am not completely convinced that those principles have been satisfied.
In saying that, I am grateful to the cabinet secretary for being willing to work with me on timeframes, which are very important. I am happy not to move those amendments so that we can have a discussion about it.
My amendment 434 looks at how landowners can be involved in the process of lotting, because they will know about services, water pipes and all those sorts of things that would be relevant. I will not press my amendment at this point and am happy to work with the cabinet secretary on potentially including such provisions in guidance instead.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 June 2025
Tim Eagle
Not moved, convener.