The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 454 contributions
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 12 November 2025
Tim Eagle
Good morning, minister. Section 3 makes changes to who can report suspected breaches of crofting duties. Two new groups are added to that list. When we had representatives of the Crofting Commission in front of us, they said that anonymous reporting made no difference to their work and that, in their eyes,
“anyone can allege a breach”
of duty, provided that they provide evidence. What is your view on widening the ability to report breaches of duties to include anyone?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 12 November 2025
Tim Eagle
Okay—fine. I think that you mentioned this in your opening statement, but some responses to the consultation said that the bill does not go far enough. Quite a lot of crofters mentioned the escalation in the market for crofts and tenancies and what that means for new entrants being priced out. How do we get new entrants into both crofting and farming, but specifically crofting, given that we are discussing that today? The bill does not really go into that. Is that something that you have missed? Is the bill a missed opportunity? How do you respond to those people who have said that the bill does not go far enough in that respect?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 12 November 2025
Tim Eagle
I asked about that because the subject was raised in the consultation responses as a significant one, so I thought that it was worth mentioning.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 12 November 2025
Tim Eagle
You are quite content that the two additional groups that, through section 3 of the bill, you propose to put into the existing legislation expand it far enough.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 5 November 2025
Tim Eagle
And that is despite the fact that the original discussions were all about Thornton track, which was an oval track at the time.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 5 November 2025
Tim Eagle
Okay.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 5 November 2025
Tim Eagle
I do not know whether this is a fair question, but people will be watching this, and we have mentioned the other bills. For absolute clarity, I am conscious that amendments have been lodged to Maurice Golden’s bill that will open up its scope to include working dogs and so on. We are talking about greyhounds here, but dogs are used in a multitude of different disciplines in Scotland. At present, the Government is not looking at doing anything else with sheepdogs, working dogs, retrieval dogs for field sports or anything like that. Is this bill, including at stage 2, for you purely about greyhounds in Scotland?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 5 November 2025
Tim Eagle
Good morning. Can you talk us through the consultation, evidence gathering and engagement that the Scottish Government has undertaken over the past several years to develop its current position on the bill? Can you take into account Thornton racetrack’s concern that the only people who replied to the consultation on the bill were animal activists? How has the Government tried to make that all as broad as possible?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 5 November 2025
Tim Eagle
Okay. So, in your mind, Thornton racetrack’s concern that the only people who had replied were animal activists is not fair, because you think that a broad range of people have responded.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 5 November 2025
Tim Eagle
I want to pick up on that point. Does that mean that you do not see any potential in licensing for an oval track instead of an outright ban? I think that the matter came before the committee in May 2024, which was prior to my time on the committee, but it is my understanding that, when we considered the petition, it was reported that there was no need for a ban, and your initial position was that there was no need for a ban. You do not see that there is a potential benefit here—that, rather than going down this route, we could use licensing both for an oval track and for any future straight track.