The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1069 contributions
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 2 December 2021
Craig Hoy
Is the board making the best use of the combination of appointed and elected members?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 2 December 2021
Craig Hoy
One of the phrases that has come up is “partnership working”. We have talked about the capacity building that has taken place in the domestic PPE industry. Is that sustainable? Does it pivot towards buying domestic product? Are health services internationally replicating that?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 2 December 2021
Craig Hoy
Has a more formal process been developed to ensure that the chief executive is held accountable to the board for his performance?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 2 December 2021
Craig Hoy
You said that training had already taken place. Will that be a continual and on-going process?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 2 December 2021
Craig Hoy
What was your response to the vote of no confidence? What is your understanding of why it has now been withdrawn?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 2 December 2021
Craig Hoy
Do you accept that there was a weakness in the arrangements beforehand?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 2 December 2021
Craig Hoy
Is there now a formal appraisal mechanism for board members?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 2 December 2021
Craig Hoy
Do you wish to add anything, Mr Barron?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 2 December 2021
Craig Hoy (South Scotland) (Con)
Good morning, Mr Mathieson and Mr Barron. The impression that I am getting from what you have said so far is that, in effect, what went wrong was circumstantial rather than systemic or attitudinal. Mr Mathieson, could you say at what point you got the impression that the leadership and governance arrangements had broken down after a period of apparent stability?
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 30 November 2021
Craig Hoy (South Scotland) (Con)
I echo what Mr Simpson has said. I welcome the use of the affirmative procedure, albeit that it is expedited—some scrutiny is better than no scrutiny at all.
It is worth saying for the record that, even though the instrument is sound, it will give effect to a policy that does not in my view meet the principal policy objective, which is
“to reduce the risk of transmission of coronavirus by ensuring”
—that is the word that it uses—
“that specified indoor public spaces where transmission risks are higher are used only by those who are vaccinated or can prove a record of a negative test.”
I stress the word “only”. We know that the vaccination passport scheme is flawed in that it does not prove that a person who presents the passport is the person who has been double vaccinated. Now, simultaneously, the scheme will not necessarily prove that a person has recorded a negative test.
The underlying problem with the scheme to which the instrument gives further effect is that it relies on good will and honesty rather than science or proof. I do not think that the instrument is defective on reporting ground (i), which is why we are not calling for it to be reported. However, the policy to which it gives effect and the scheme that is being applied are defective. I would very much welcome our drawing that to the attention of the lead committee and hearing what it has to say on that before we consider the instrument again next week.