The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 824 contributions
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 February 2026
Dr Pam Gosal MBE
Obviously, it is important that the committee takes the right evidence and ensures that it puts forward the right actions to the Scottish Government. Therefore, it would be good to hear from each of you one thing—I am sure that there are many, but I am asking for only one—that you would like us to take forward from today’s evidence. It might be something that you have experienced in your organisation that we could ask the Scottish Government for to make the process a bit easier for neurodivergent people—especially victims—or to ensure that they are listened to and that a proper service is provided. If you could each give me just one suggestion, that would be great.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 February 2026
Dr Pam Gosal MBE
Does anybody else want to come in?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 February 2026
Dr Pam Gosal MBE
Thank you for those responses. I will come back to Superintendent Gallie, as something is worrying me. I am hearing from you about all the good stuff that is happening, which is good news. However, if you cannot identify those markers, and you do not collect that data, how will you know who needs that help, and how will you know to put those services in place?
In addition, when you pass information on to the Crown Office, what information are you passing on? If you are not collecting the data on whether a person has a disability or needs further help, is it—if I may use these words—a guessing game? I know that sometimes people will not tell the police; sometimes you have to ask. I am a bit worried about how information is passed on. Is it just basically the luck of the draw, where if you see something, you pass it on? You do not collect that information, and if you do not collect it, we will not have the data in the Parliament to understand how much help your services need. It is about both sides. Perhaps you can give me a bit more clarity on that. If you are not collecting the data, how do you know?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 February 2026
Dr Pam Gosal MBE
I am a member of the Scottish Parliament for the West Scotland region, from the Conservative Party. I am also a member of the committee.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 February 2026
Dr Pam Gosal MBE
It is interesting that you say that, because ethnicity and disability are the two things that I brought up around data collection in my bill on domestic abuse. It is so important that we know first hand what is happening; you can then have the services. Jenny Miller is right: how can you have services in place if you do not know what the data is? Thank you—this has been really helpful.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 February 2026
Dr Pam Gosal MBE
I thank you all for the information that you have provided so far. Neurodivergent individuals, including those with autism, ADHD or learning disabilities, are between two and three times more likely to experience domestic abuse. Reports suggest that up to 84 per cent may experience violence in their lives. Unfortunately, disability status is not recorded by Police Scotland when domestic abuse incidents are reported. As you might be aware, I had introduced a member’s bill—the Prevention of Domestic Abuse (Scotland) Bill—that would have required authorities to record the information, but, unfortunately, the First Minister’s refusal to back my bill meant that I had to withdraw it.
Taking into account that that data is not collected, what systems are in place to identify neurodivergent people during different stages of the criminal justice process, especially women who are victims of horrendous crimes such as domestic abuse? I hope that most of you can answer that, so I will open it up, but perhaps Laura Buchan can start.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 February 2026
Dr Pam Gosal MBE
John, do you have something to say? If not, that is fine.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 February 2026
Dr Pam Gosal MBE
Thank you.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 February 2026
Dr Pam Gosal MBE
Good morning. I am a Scottish Conservative Party MSP for the West Scotland region.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 February 2026
Dr Pam Gosal MBE
I have one more follow-on question. Earlier, we spoke about a postcode lottery and the regional differences between rural and urban areas. I want to touch on diverse communities. Much earlier in our evidence sessions, we had a lady in who spoke about being from a black, Asian and minority ethnic background. Coming from a BAME background myself, I obviously know people who have autism. Sometimes, it is very hard for families—I am sure that this happens in many families and not just those from a BAME background—to accept that there is an issue or a need for support or help. Do you have any data or information about how you would work around that? It could end up being a postcode lottery, because how people from some BAME backgrounds might be spoken to or asked certain questions is culturally sensitive. How do you work around that? Is there a postcode lottery and are there differences?