The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 6211 contributions
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 14 September 2021
Ariane Burgess
I thank all three of you for coming along this morning. The session has been very helpful—I have certainly become aware of the more nuanced issues that everyone has raised. If we have any other questions, we will put them to you in letter form. I now close the public part of our meeting, and we move into private session for our next item.
11:38 Meeting continued in private until 12:30.Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 14 September 2021
Ariane Burgess
Thank you both for your responses. What has clearly come through the conversation this morning is the point around councillors’ remuneration and the acknowledgement of their role, and how improvement there would encourage people to come forward. The committee has already been talking about that and it is perhaps a piece of work that we need to take on and explore. That would be fitting, because the committee members include three current councillors and a former councillor, so we have a valuable perspective in that regard.
I appreciate your contributions this morning. We have to wrap up this session now, but I give you the opportunity to say whether there is anything that has not come out at all in the discussion. I see that you are both shaking your heads. Okay. Thank you so much for speaking to us today.
I have a question for Karen Greaves, which I will put in writing, on her mention of a tweak to the Kirkwall boundary. I will seek clarity in a letter to her about what she meant by that, because my understanding is that if we accept the boundaries, they must be accepted as they currently stand.
We will have a brief suspension.
10:22 Meeting suspended.Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 14 September 2021
Ariane Burgess
Thanks for that, Douglas. We missed a bit of the preamble to your statement that the proposals should be rejected, but that conclusion is very clear. Elena, is that okay?
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 14 September 2021
Ariane Burgess
We will move on to questions about process.
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 14 September 2021
Ariane Burgess
Thank you both. The next question from Paul McLennan will move to a different theme. I suggest that colleagues ask their question and then direct it to somebody to kick off, so that the witnesses get some guidance on who should start.
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 14 September 2021
Ariane Burgess
It is great to hear in more detail about Boundaries Scotland’s good work and how well it has been listening in Shetland and Orkney.
Elena Whitham would like to explore a couple of themes.
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 14 September 2021
Ariane Burgess
We will shift themes a little and look a bit more at the Electoral Reform Society’s work on electoral parity.
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 14 September 2021
Ariane Burgess
We have a range of questions that will help us to dig into some of what you have just highlighted in your opening remarks. Let us see how we go. There will be a little time at the end for the three of you to highlight anything that might not have been brought to light in our questioning.
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 14 September 2021
Ariane Burgess
Elena Whitham has a couple of questions.
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 14 September 2021
Ariane Burgess
That is great to hear. Before we hear questions from other committee members, I will give Margaret Davidson and Douglas Hendry an opportunity to go into the detail of why their councils hold the views they hold about the proposals. Perhaps Douglas can expand a bit on why there is a split perspective on some aspects of the proposals. That would be helpful.