The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1280 contributions
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 24 February 2026
Karen Adam
Our next item of business is consideration of three negative Scottish statutory instruments. As no member has indicated that they have comments, are members content not to make any comments to the Parliament on any of the instruments?
Members indicated agreement.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 24 February 2026
Karen Adam
That concludes consideration of the instruments. We will suspend briefly to set up for our next agenda item.
09:47
Meeting suspended.
09:57
On resuming—
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 24 February 2026
Karen Adam
We move to questions from members, and I will kick us off. What specific progress has been made on the human rights bill?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 February 2026
Karen Adam
Having made sure that all members have asked everything that they wanted to ask, I just want to thank everyone very much. That brings our first round-table session to a close. I suspend the meeting briefly to allow for a changeover of witnesses for our next session.
10:36
Meeting suspended.
10:43
On resuming—
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 February 2026
Karen Adam
That is really interesting. You do not think that neurodivergence is more prevalent; rather, there is perhaps just more understanding of neurodivergence overall, and identification of neurodivergence, whereas in years gone by, people would not have understood particular behaviours as such.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 February 2026
Karen Adam
Thank you.
Dani, you raised barriers to diagnosis in your answer to the first question. Is that one of those issues where there might be a prejudice or a misunderstanding, particularly for girls?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 February 2026
Karen Adam
I do not want to put words into anybody’s mouth, so I am being careful about how I word the questions. In some of the evidence that we have heard, there is often a misunderstanding of how neurodivergence presents. If it does not conform to the way in which the school day should be run, that might be picked up, but it is not until there is a disruptor in that day that it is pulled out. If a child is struggling without a disruptor, that is not picked up so much.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 February 2026
Karen Adam
That would be helpful.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 February 2026
Karen Adam
Thank you for that, Rob. We have looked at the issue through quite a negative lens, because a lot is wrong for neurodivergent people at the moment. However, when we get this right—when a school or health authority gets it right—and a young person in adulthood has the right support mechanisms in place or enjoys a neurodivergent-friendly upbringing and experience, what difference does that make, not only for the individual but for society as a whole? What is the selling point of getting this right for neurodivergent people?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 February 2026
Karen Adam
Natasha has indicated that she would like to come in.