The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1106 contributions
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 February 2026
Marie McNair
You must be in my headspace because that is exactly what I was going to say to you—awareness is so important in breaking the stigma. I recently watched “Dinosaur”, the Ashley Storrie drama, which I think has run over two series. It was informative and very helpful, and we need more of that.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 February 2026
Marie McNair
If you have anything else that you want to update the committee on, feel free to send us a written submission. That would be really helpful in addition to the evidence session.
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft] Business until 12:46
Meeting date: 18 November 2025
Marie McNair
I appreciate getting the opportunity to speak early on in the group, convener, which will enable me to get back to the Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee.
My amendment 244 goes to the heart of the wider debate about assisted dying. Those who are in favour of the bill have consistently said that it is about allowing someone to end their own life and not about another person ending it for them. However, the bill as drafted does not clearly rule out that possibility. There is no clear prohibition on another person administering the life-ending substance on behalf of the patient, and that omission matters. If another person can administer the substance, we are not talking about assisted dying but about euthanasia. That is a very different act in moral and legal terms. If the Parliament allows that ambiguity to remain, we risk crossing a boundary that even many supporters of assisted dying do not wish to cross.
My amendment would bring clarity. It would strengthen section 15 to make it explicit that the substance must be self-administered by the terminally ill adult, and that no one else may do so on their behalf. It would preserve the distinction between assisted dying and euthanasia—a distinction that supporters of the bill believe is fundamental. It would ensure that assisted dying remains in law and in practice an act of personal agency, rather than the taking of life by another. Proponents of assisted dying say that they oppose euthanasia. If that is truly the case, they should have no hesitation in supporting the amendment.
11:00Social Justice and Social Security Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 13 November 2025
Marie McNair
Good morning. I want to cover the bill’s definition of “sustainable development”, which seems to align very closely with the Scottish Government’s suggestion in its own consultation. However, in our evidence sessions we have heard that the bill’s proposed definition could be strengthened. What is the Scottish Government's view on that?
Social Justice and Social Security Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 13 November 2025
Marie McNair
Thank you. I was going to ask a follow-up question, but it has been covered.
Social Justice and Social Security Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 6 November 2025
Marie McNair
Thank you.
The witnesses’ written evidence suggests that the duty
“to have due regard for the need to promote wellbeing and sustainable development”
could allow adherence to be something of a tick-box exercise. Do you want to take this opportunity to set out concerns and how they could be addressed in the bill?
Social Justice and Social Security Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 6 November 2025
Marie McNair
Thank you.
Social Justice and Social Security Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 6 November 2025
Marie McNair
That was really helpful.
Social Justice and Social Security Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 6 November 2025
Marie McNair
I am sorry to put you on the spot, Jenny, but your written evidence stated that the bill
“should support planners in their continued delivery of sustainable development and wellbeing”
but that there is a need to be mindful of existing definitions and obligations. How might planning authorities balance those requirements if the bill is passed?
Social Justice and Social Security Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 6 November 2025
Marie McNair
In the interests of time, I will be brief as well. If you do not really want to answer a question—if it is not relevant to you—please do not do so.
I will start with Jenny Munro. I want to ask about the definition of public bodies and the duty on public bodies. In section 1, is the definition of public bodies appropriate? Should it include all those who contract with public bodies?