The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 861 contributions
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 February 2026
Emma Roddick
:How much of the increase in appeals and in cases overall is a result of certain individuals putting in more, rather than the wider public becoming more attuned to using FOI?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 February 2026
Emma Roddick
:Is that partly because of the way in which the system was designed? I sit and figure out how to word what it is that I am looking for, but it is then perhaps difficult to look at my request because authorities think, “Where is she going with this?”
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 February 2026
Emma Roddick
:My concern is about where there should be intervention from legislation or policy to tighten up what can be done. There are legitimate uses of those tools, but AI also opens us up to the potential of people overwhelming public authorities on purpose, whether that is local people or people from further afield.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 February 2026
Emma Roddick
:The numbers alone kind of answer this, but is there a risk that a new backlog will appear?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 February 2026
Emma Roddick
:On the soft limit of five, you mentioned exceptions. What type of exceptions would you consider?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 February 2026
Emma Roddick
:How good are public bodies at discerning whether a request is vexatious or just difficult to deal with?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 February 2026
Emma Roddick
:You mentioned dealing with interlinked cases and being a bit smarter about them. Are particular themes emerging in the appeals that come through to your office?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 February 2026
Emma Roddick
:So, you are thinking case by case whether it is legitimate, rather than thinking about the person, such as a journalist or an MSP, and why they might have multiple open cases.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 February 2026
Emma Roddick
I want to ask about appeals. I know that the number of appeals is still roughly proportionate to the number of requests that are coming in, but, as you were saying, that is increasing exponentially. What arrangements does the office have in place for monitoring incoming cases and appeals, and how are you managing the overall demand from appeals?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 February 2026
Emma Roddick
:Yes. I can empathise with that situation entirely. With a lot of casework that MSPs get, the trick is trying to figure out whether it is a constituent who did not feel confident drafting something themselves—that might also be the case in the example that you gave, and that seems like a legitimate use of AI—or whether it has just been created by AI. How do you navigate that and figure out whether something is a legitimate request that somebody needed help drafting? How do you decide whether the person wants the information and it is a fair ask of the organisation, or whether it is not even a real person and nobody needs the information?